The idea emerged during my visit to the site, at a time when yet another electric motor failure had occurred. One day, the facility manager, Mr. Krzysztof Rejdych, contacted me with an urgent request to repair a damaged motor. As it happened, I personally delivered the repaired unit. During our meeting, Mr. Krzysztof gave me a tour of the plant and showed me the application in which the motor we had repaired was operating.
To begin, I will briefly outline the situation as I found it. Let us consider a section of the process line driven by a two-speed electric motor rated at 18,5/23 kW, coupled with a mechanical gearbox. This drive system moves a set of cables to which a trolley is attached. The mechanical structure itself includes a series of limit switches that indicate the trolley’s current position and signal when a gear change or a stop is required. All motor starts and speed changes (firsth or second gear) were performed directly from the mains using line contactors. Each start-up resulted in significant electrical and mechanical overloads. The entire structure was therefore subjected to substantial stress.
While touring the facility, we discussed the causes of the failures. At one point, Mr. Krzysztof asked whether it would be possible to eliminate them, or at least reduce them, since downtime generates considerable costs. In response, I suggested installing a variable frequency drive (VFD), which would address the existing issues by providing full control of motor operation, limiting overloads, and changing the braking behavior, as the frequency converter would assume the primary braking duty. I explained the difference between the previous operation - where the brake stopped the trolley at full speed, causing significant overloads - and a scenario in which the brake engages when the trolley is virtually at rest, which substantially extends service life by greatly increasing the operating time of the brake discs. With a VFD, the brake operates sequentially and protects the entire drive system in the event of a power loss; it is, in practice, not part of the motor’s braking process. After the upgrade, the brake effectively serves as a holding device. During the visit, I also noted the trolley’s mass and the potential energy accumulated each time it was positioned at the top. Until then, I had not given this much consideration, and like many engineers and automation specialists I know-when faced with excess regenerative energy returning from the motor, especially during rapid deceleration, I would routinely recommend a braking resistor. In this case, however, being on site prompted me to reconsider and ask myself: why waste what appears to be a substantial amount of energy when it could be utilised? I knew that Mitsubishi Electric offers energy regeneration modules, yet I had never heard of anyone applying such a solution at a concrete batching plant, where a gearbox with a significant reduction ratio is typically used. Nevertheless, I concluded that the amount of energy involved was sufficient to justify the approach. Therefore, instead of a braking resistor - which dissipates energy as heat, I proposed using a regenerative module to recover energy and apply it within the production process. Mr. Krzysztof responded very positively to my proposal and immediately requested a quotation along with the earliest feasible implementation date. To ensure the proper selection of components and to verify the potential electrical energy savings our implementation team, led by Dawid Wróblewski, performed on site measurements and a data analysis, after which we proceeded with the modernisation.
With respect to the question regarding operating efficiency, I would like to highlight two aspects. The first concerns overloads and mechanical stresses that affect system service life and the number of costly downtime events; the second relates to energy efficiency. It should be emphasised that the trolley is one of the key elements of the production line, performing several hundred cycles per day (traveling up and down). Considering this, it is easy to recognise the difference in brake wear and service life before and after the modernisation. To clarify this point, I will use an analogy to automotive braking. Please consider applying the brake at an almost zero speed - there is virtually no brake disc wear, compared with hard braking while traveling, for example, at 50 km/h. In addition, other parts of the system, such as: the gearbox, cables, tensioning wheels, and the overall structure, were continuously exposed to significant stresses and overloads, which reduced service life and, consequently, increased the number of repairs and cost - generating downtime events.
When assessing energy efficiency, several key considerations should be taken into account. First, supplying power directly from the mains creates overload conditions at every commissioning and during each gear change. In such cases, the motor draws an inrush current at commissioning that is several times its rated current, while gear changes produce current spikes resulting from abrupt speed shifts and the need to adapt the drive to new operating conditions. These sudden overloads also adversely affect the operation of other machines and equipment throughout the facility. Second, most motors (as in this case) deliver higher power in the higher, faster gear, which is entirely unjustified under these specific conditions. Although the trolley moves at twice the speed, it does so without a load and, moreover, while traveling downward. As a result, the motor operates significantly underloaded and therefore inefficiently. Third, prior to the upgrade, the trolley was pulled downward by gravity, and maintaining an appropriate speed required electric motor braking - so-called plugging (countercurrent braking). Because no braking control system was in place, the motor received virtually rated current from the line contactor for the entire duration of the trolley’s descent. After installing the variable - frequency drive, we achieved full control over the braking process. During descent, the motor shifts into generator operation, meaning that a very large amount of electrical energy flows back from the motor to the drive. By adding a dedicated regenerative module that enables the recovered energy from the trolley motor to be fed directly into the facility’s electrical grid, we realised substantial electricity savings. Previously, we had to supply a high current to the motor in order to control the trolley’s descent. Now we supply a very low current to the motor, and additionally, during each downward run we generate approximately 4 kW of energy, which is returned to the facility grid and utilised in other production processes.